Arguments vs Eth PoS?

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

I think having the current level of participation in the network (over 99%) many of previous objections seem less relevant.

It looks like financial incentives force people to participate in a pretty reliable way.

I think the biggest question now is how much resilient PoS will be to gov action.

Many many people use crypto because they want a more free financial system resilient against government intervention.

With PoS you have validators that in many cases well known and are vulnerable to the gov

If I owned crypto on a PoW chain, I would probably not transfer it immediately to PoS. I would wait until the PoS system proves to be resilient. I think many people will take this approach.

PoW operators are much more easily identified by governments than PoS validators due to their massive energy consumption.

The original post has low signal-to-noise ratio.