I would be interested in having a standards document by which the conventions of organizational literature informing the “boundaries of the firm” construct could be harmonized with, or translated back and forth between, the notation in specs like the Yellow Paper. [Edited to note @jonchoi 2017’s CAPM / fixed income modeling, add section 0.1 after looking at notation in some recent posts, retract my cheap talk about cheap talk about “centralization,” and ask please excuse the overwrought distraction, my bad.]
As “extremely not an econ PhD,” personally, I’d find it absurd to be pedantic about playing the hits below, as it were. They are the product of [e:] effort processing [/e:] your characterization of efficient centralization as a boundaries of the firm problem. As a noncontributing member of the peanut gallery, I wonder whether and how building on, or mapping to, items 2 and 3 (universality & modularity) in the whitepaper design principles might (or should, as a matter of economic historiography) instrumentalize a model of industrial development.
- [Structures/Setups] (JEL: D21, D80, D86, L15, L2_, L69)
Arrow 1973
Milgrom & Roberts 1990
Fortunato & Hric 2016
Aghion & Holden 2011
Jones & Romer 2010
0.1
Schrijvers, Bonneau, Boneh, Roughgarden 2016
Milgrom 2000
Black 1976
Jackson 2010 // [WorldCat] - [Cognitive Costs/Market Frictions] (JEL: D8_, D91, O17)
Holmstrom & Milgrom 1991
Greif & Mokyr 2017
Aoki 2009
Romer 2015
Aghion & Bolton 1987 - [Culture/Values] (JEL: E14, E22, E26, L14, Z00, Z1_?)
Lazear 1995
Jackson 2018
Pedraza-Farina 2017
Granovetter 1985 - [Power/Authority] (JEL: D02, G32, H32, P26, P48)
Coase 1937
Jensen & Meckling 1976
Demsetz 1983
Aghion & Tirole 1997
Grossman & Hart 1986 - [Commitment/Teams/Agency] (L2, O31, D23)
Holmstrom 1982
Kandel & Lazear 1992
Klein, Crawford, Alchian 1978