I’m curious. Doesn’t this create a small number of large, very active contracts that will come to dominate the cache thereby creating two tiers? Smart contracts that are always in the cache (and therefore always cheaper) vs. those that are rarely in the cache and therefore more expensive. Doesn’t this establish winners-take-all in the long run? Won’t it become increasingly more difficult for new entrants to “break in”? That seems like a bad idea to me.
1 Like