Thanks for the great answer again ! It’s interesting.
• First, I totally agree with the number of the miner(validator) should be set more upper since the relationship betweeen the tx fee price and the number of miners is inversed. Just wondering how the +1M validators could be incentivized in a long run.
• Second, if I got you right, you mean that not every node is going to check the txs and the “delegated validation” model is implemented? I think this idea is opposite from the first one. If there is any randomly chosen commitee or validator pool,
i) the number of miners who has the real power to validate the block is going to be centralized like the dPoS.
ii) how do we protect the cartel between them ? What if the validator party sets their own rule like “+10gwei gas prices first, others second” ?
I think if the validator party doesn’t know each other and dynamic changes of validator set is built, maybe the two worries above are just misunderstanding.